REQUESTING DR.VIC-(HE KNOWS THE PAPER TRAIL)SYNTHESIS PAPER

Week 7Synthesis Paper

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to present a revised evidence synthesis paper using the Week 5 submission, integrating course faculty feedback. This includes revising all parts of the assignment as recommended as well as the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Also, please add new content identified below (Selection of Translation Science Model – 6f).

Instructions

Follow these guidelines when completing the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have any questions.

1. Review the directions and complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Use the 3 articles: 2 quantitative and 1 qualitative used in Weeks 3, 4, and 5. These must be recent research articles less than 5 years old and be related to a National Practice Problem.
   1. Link (Word doc): Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.).
2. Use the most current version of Microsoft Word that is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing. You can tell the document is saved as the current version because it will end in “docx.”
3. All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed. This written assignment will be screened for originality by Turnitin.
4. Revise the paper from Week 5, including course faculty feedback and adding the new section (6f).
5. Review the rubric for the grading criteria.

The assignment includes the following components:

1. Title Page
2. Introduction
   1. Introduce the practice problem.
   2. Discuss sources of research evidence identified in Weeks 3, 4, and 5.
3. Analysis of the Practice Problem (1-2 paragraphs)
   1. Present the significance of the practice problem.
   2. Present the prevalence of the practice problem from the selected articles.
4. Evidence Synthesis: Using the three articles (2 quantitative and 1 qualitative), write a synthesis of evidence to address the selected practice problem. In the synthesis of evidence include the following:
   1. Identify the main themes and salient evidence that emerge from the sources. (Cited)
   2. Compare and contrast the main points from all sources. (Cited)
   3. Present an objective overarching discussion of evidence about the practice problem.
5. Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Practice Problem: Include the following:
   1. Identify the level of evidence.
   2. Provide a quality rating of the evidence.
   3. Appraise and support the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem.
6. Selection of a Translation Theory or Model (1-2 paragraphs)
   1. Present the components of the theory.
   2. Discuss how stakeholders are integrated into the design of the theory or model.
7. Conclusion
   1. In one concise paragraph, provide a clear and logical conclusion summarizing the paper.
8. Summary Table: Complete all sections of the Summary Tables of Evidence using the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Include the following:
   1. Two Quantitative Research Studies (identified in Week 3 & 4 Discussion).
   2. One Qualitative Research Studies (identified in Week 5 Discussion).
   3. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence.
9. Appendix A
   1. Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Summary Tool as Appendix A.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

• Length: 5-7 pages (not including title page or references page)
• 1-inch margins
• Double-spaced pages
• 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
• Headings & subheadings
• In-text citations
• Title page
• References page
• Standard English usage and mechanics
• Revisions based on course faculty feedback from Week 5 Assignment

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

1. Appraise the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in leading collaborative teams across the diverse healthcare systems. (POs 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9)
2. Critically appraise literature for level and quality of evidence to support practice change. (POs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7)
3. Appraise global healthcare practice problems and DNP practice relevant to advanced nursing practice. (POs 1, 3, 9)
4. Evaluate and integrate ethical principles and theories relevant to translation science theories and quality improvement (QI) methods. (POs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
5. Evaluate the structure and function of the interprofessional team and stakeholders in the translation of evidence. (POs 4, 6, 8, 9)

Due Date

• By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
• Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

W7 Assignment Grading Rubric

W7 Assignment Grading Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Requirements:1. Introduce the practice problem.2. Discuss sources of research evidence selected in Weeks 3, 4, and 5.

20 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction.

18 pts

Includes all requirements with a very good introduction.

16 pts

Includes all requirements with a basic introduction.

0 pts

Poor introduction and/or includes 1 or fewer requirements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of the Practice Problem

Requirements:1. Present the significance of the practice problem.2. Present the prevalence of the practice problem.

20 pts

Includes all requirements and an provides an excellent analysis of the practice problem and prevalence.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and a very good analysis of the practice problem and prevalence.

16 pts

Includes all requirements with a basic analysis of the practice problem and prevalence.

0 pts

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or with a poor analysis of the practice problem or prevalence.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Synthesis

Requirements:1. Present main themes, and salient findings that emerge from the sources (Cited).2. Compare and Contrast the main points from all sources (Cited).3. Present an objective overarching discussion of evidence about the practice problem and prevalence.

50 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent evidence synthesis.

45 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good evidence synthesis.

40 pts

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements with a basic evidence synthesis.

0 pts

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor evidence synthesis.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppraise the Evidence

Requirements:1. Level of evidence.2. Quality rating of evidence.3. Appraise and support the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem.

20 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent appraisal of the evidence.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good appraisal of the evidence.

16 pts

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements and provides a basic appraisal of the evidence.

0 pts

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor appraisal of the evidence.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelection of a Translation Theory or Model

Requirements:1. Present the components of the theory.2. Discuss how stakeholders are integrated into the design of the theory or model.

50 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of translation model and/or stakeholders integration into theory model.

45 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of translation model and/or how stake holders integration into theory model.

40 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a basic discussion of translation model and/or how stake holders integration into theory model.

0 pts

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor presentation of components of translation theory and how stake holders are integrated into the theory model.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Requirements:In one concise paragraph, provide a clear and logical conclusion that summarizes the paper.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent conclusion.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good conclusion.

8 pts

Includes all requirements and/or provides a basic conclusion.

0 pts

Provides a poor conclusion.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevisions

Requirements:Revisions done based on course faculty feedback from Week 5 Assignment .

50 pts

Substantial revisions have been made based on course faculty feedback on the week 5 paper.

0 pts

Limited or no revisions have been made based on faculty feedback on the week 5 paper.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary Table

Requirements:1. Two quantitative research studies2. One qualitative research studies3. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence.

15 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent summary table.

13 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good summary table.

12 pts

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements or a basic summary table.

0 pts

Includes no requirements or a poorly completed summary table.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix A

Requirements:Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Summary Tool as Appendix A.

10 pts

Includes tool in the appendix.

0 pts

Does not include the tool in the appendix.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Standards

Requirements:1. Use appropriate Level I headers.2. Reference and citations are in current APA style.3. Paper length is 5-7 pages excluding title, reference pages, and appendix.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and presents excellent APA style and standards.

9 pts

Includes 3 requirements and very good APA style and standards.

8 pts

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements of APA style and standards.

0 pts

Includes 1 or fewer requirements of APA style and standards.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing

Requirements:1. Use standard English grammar and sentence structure.2. No spelling or typographical errors.3. Organized presentation of ideas.

20 pts

Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and demonstrates very good clarity of writing.

16 pts

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing.

0 pts

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.

20 pts

Total Points: 275

PreviousNext