This post includes NURS 6002 week 4 assignment, Step 1: Research Analysis of NURS 6002 week 4 assignment sample solution, Justification for recommending the article to inform professional practice, Step 2: Summary of Analysis
NURS 6002 Week 4 Assignment | Part 4: Research Analysis
I have identified one topic of interest for further study. I have researched and identified one peer-reviewed research article focused on this topic and have analyzed this article. The results of these efforts are shared below. NURS 6002 week 4 assignment
Step 1: Research Analysis of NURS 6002 week 4 assignment sample solution
Complete the table below
|Topic of Interest:
|Addressing hospital acquired infection
|Research Article: Include full citation in APA format, as well as link or search details (such as DOI)
|Palmqvist, C., Samuelsson, A., Fröding, I., & Giske, C. (2019). Surface Contamination of CT and MRI Equipment—A Potential Source for Transmission of Hospital-Acquired Infections. Journal of Radiology Nursing, 38(4), 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradnu.2019.09.002
|Professional Practice Use:
One or more professional practice uses of the theories/concepts presented in the article
|The article identifies the most contaminated surfaces inside and outside the CT and MRI laboratories to include all hand-touched surfaces such as key boards, chairs and other furniture in public areas, headphones, and alarm buzzer/control. The implication is that these surfaces may be a potential source of pathogens that cause HAIs, and they should be regularly cleaned and disinfected to avoid cross contamination and HAIs occurrence. The hand-touched surfaces should be disinfected between patients as they are a potential source of pathogenic contaminants.
|Research Analysis Matrix
Add more rows if necessary
|Strengths of the Research
|Limitations of the Research
|Relevancy to Topic of Interest
|Relied on primary data collected by directly testing surfaces in ten radiology departments.
|This ensures that robust data is collected from many sources.
|Data from ten departments thus offers a large data sample.
|This presents a generalized awareness of surface contamination for patients visiting CT and MRI facilities.
|Data collected from six public and four private radiology departments, thus providing insight into public and private facilities.
|Collecting data from public and private facilities ensures that the results can be generalized for the two types of facilities.
|Applied a defined data collection procedure that facilitated efforts to collect contaminants thus ensuring that pathogenic contaminants could be collected.
|The procedure ensures that there is uniformity in data collection for all the facilities so that the comparison is valid.
|NURS 6002 week 4 assignment
|Makes use of quantitative analysis that presents numeric results.
|Quantitative analysis offers an understanding of trends, showing the hand-touched surfaces that present the most concern and require the greatest attention.
|Samples collected from predetermined surfaces in all the facilities.
|Predetermining the surfaces to be tested ensured that there was uniformity of data collection in all facilities.
|The test was conducted for a limited number of pathogenic contaminants with the possibility that some contaminants were overlooked in the cultures.
|There is a possibility that some pathogenic contaminants were overlooked since the cultures could identify the targeted contaminants. This shows that some important information may be missing.
|Does not explore the link between contaminated surfaces and HAIs occurrence.
|It is unclear whether the contaminated surfaces are linked to HAI occurrence. The assumption is made that contaminated surfaces would increase the incidences of HAIs.
Justification for recommending the article to inform professional practice (NURS 6002 week 4 assignment)
Eight justifications have been identified for recommending Palmqvist et al. (2019) to inform professional practice. The first justification is that the article tells a good story as it is well written and easy to understand with logical arguments. There are no contradictions in the presented arguments so that readers can follow and understand the progression of ideas. The second justification is that the article includes a literature review and discussion that makes connections between the research interest and prior work in the same field. This helps to clarify the article’s arguments and contextualizing the new information being presented in terms of what it adds to the existing body of knowledge. The third justification is that the article applies rigorous methods with explanations of why and how the collected data supports the conclusions made. The rigorous methods show that the collected data can be trusted and they facilitate efforts to replicate the study to verify its results. The fourth justification is that the article makes use of appropriate methods to explore the issue. The method applied in the study (swabbing surfaces to collect contaminants) is appropriate for collecting the required data. The fifth justification is that the insight gained from the article stimulates new and important questions. The article raises questions about the link between surface contamination and HAI incidence. The sixth justification is that the insight gained from the article helps to advance an existing framework that calls for surfaces in medical facilities to be routinely disinfected to eliminate the contaminants that are continuously being introduced. The seventh justification is that the insight gained from the articles is useful for making decisions concerning the control of HAIs. The final justification is that it offers insight into surface contamination in medical facilities, as an important issue with implications for HAIs (Wicker & Browning, 2020). It is for these eight reasons that the article would be recommended to inform professional practice. (NURS 6002 week 4 assignment)
Step 2: Summary of Analysis
The search for peer-reviewed research relied heavily on information from course readings and cursory online search that offers important insight into the topic of interest. It revealed that peer-reviewed research is mainly published in journals. The insight would then be used to develop keywords to guide searches for relevant articles in biomedical databases (Zaccagnini & White, 2017). In addition to keywords, the searches would be restricted to publication parameters such as the publication dates, type of research and level of evidence. Once an appropriate number of articles have been identified to saturate the themes derived from the initial insights, the selected articles be subjected to a critical analysis based on a scientific framework that evaluates the key sections of a scientific research publication. In addition to simply identifying the research articles, attention was also paid to author credentials and their affiliations as this offers important understanding into the author qualifications to conduct such research (Bauer, 2017). (NURS 6002 week 4 assignment)
Two strategies were identified as effective for finding peer-reviewed research articles. The first strategy is conducting a search in a library database and limiting the search to peer-reviewed research articles. Most library databases have search functions that limit the search to specified parameters. The second strategy is conducting a search in a combined search tab, such as Google or Yahoo search tab that searches multiple databases at the same time. (Step 2 Summary of Analysis)
One important resource that will be useful in the future for finding peer-reviewed research is the Google search tab. Firstly, it offers access to a large number of publications on different subjects. It is the most widely used search tool. Secondly, it has functions to limit the search parameters, such as publication language, dates and types. Thirdly, it is a free resource that does not require subscription. Finally, it can be accessed using any device with internet access thus making it convenient.