Translational Research Graphic Organizer
- Translational Research Graphic Organizer Sample Question
- Translational Research Graphic Organizer template docx
- Translational Research Graphic Organizer Rubric
- Translational Research Graphic Organizer Solution
Use the \”Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template\” to compare three types of translational research with traditional (qualitative or quantitative) research. Make sure to include methodology, goals, and data collection in your organizer.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
|Course Code||Class Code||Assignment Title||Total Points|
|NUR-550||NUR-550-O502||Translational Research Graphic Organizer||100.0|
|Criteria||Percentage||Unsatisfactory (0.00%)||Less than Satisfactory (80.00%)||Satisfactory (88.00%)||Good (92.00%)||Excellent (100.00%)|
|Translational Research Graphic Organizer||100.0%|
|Comparison of Research in Relation to Methodology||25.0%||A comparison of research in relation to methodology is not included.||A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.||A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present.||A comparison of research in relation to methodology is clearly provided and well developed.||A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to methodology is thoroughly developed with supporting details.|
|Comparison of Research in Relation to Goals||25.0%||A comparison of research in relation to goals is not included.||A comparison of research in relation to goals is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.||A comparison of research in relation to goals is present.||A comparison of research in relation to goals is clearly provided and well developed.||A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to goals is thoroughly developed with supporting details.|
|Comparison of Research in Relation to Data Collection||25.0%||A comparison of research in relation to data collection is not included.||A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.||A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present.||A comparison of research in relation to data collection is clearly provided and well developed.||A comprehensive comparison research in relation to data collection is thoroughly developed with supporting details.|
|Required Sources||5.0%||Sources are not included.||Number of required sources is only partially met.||Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.||Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.||Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.|
|Presentation||10.0%||The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.||The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.||The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.||The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.||The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.|
|Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)||5.0%||Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.||Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.||Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.||Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.||The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.|
|Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)||5.0%||Sources are not documented.||Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.||Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.||Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.||Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.|
Translational Research Graphic Organizer Solution
|Translational Research||Traditional (Qualitative or Quantitative) Research||Observations (Similarities/Differences)|
|Methodology||Translation research requires the direct involvement of the with the variables to ensure the projected conclusion is achieved (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015). It integrates the wishes of the general public, with individuals being engaged to assess their requirements for health innovation. During the course of the research, the researcher controls dependent variable. Translational research involves basic research, clinical research, and practice. Basic research discovers new technologies and generates fundamental scientific new knowledge.
T1 is mainly biological, technological, and methodology. Occurs at a phase where new knowledge of illness mechanisms acquired in the laboratory are moved to creation of new methodologies for therapy, diagnosis, and prevention. The phase requires animal and preclinical studies and clinical trials and emphasis of new methods in the practice without involving human subjects.
Clinical research uses human participants in research.
T2 and T3 entail the vagaries of organizational and human behavior. T2 restricts the translation of findings from clinical surveys into daily healthcare decision-making and clinical practices.
T3 is the ‘how’ healthcare delivers. Results from T2 are applied in T3. It requires information flow, accessibility and availability of data. It involves translation to individuals and communities monitoring morbidity, risks, benefits, mortality, and effects to change and policy.
|Methodologies applied during data collection for traditional research include surveys, participant observation/ observation, focus groups, experiments, archival study/analysis of secondary data, experiments, and mixed methods (amalgamation of various methods) (Glasbey et’ al, 2019).
|Both are hypothesis-oriented and complex researches.
In both researches, the researcher develops and is an active participant in the research process.
Additionally, in both, the end goal of the research is not directly quantified in the beginning and the course, and it results in answering the proposed research problem.
|Goals||Translation research is a significantly interdisciplinary field and the objective is majorly to combine the assets of several disciplines, expertise, and resources into a single group to advance the global palliative care system considerably (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015). Translational research promotes and encourages the collaboration of multidiscipline among clinical and laboratory researchers. The findings assist in promoting enhancements in diagnosis, prevention, and therapies in the health care sector (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015). It identifies and supports the implementation and adoption of best health and medical practices. It also seeks to move(translate) basic science discoveries more efficiently ad quickly into healthcare practice. T1 emphasizes of the development of primary science breakthroughs to a state where they are equipped for clinical use.
T2 focuses on the implementation of palliative care systems and public health initiatives (Fort et. al., 2017) .T3 ensures efficient delivery of evidence-based interventions to people and populations.
|Traditional research is a methodical and organized process that entails a standard scientific methodology (Al-Hadithy, 2015). The research is necessary for the improvement knowledge by the researchers (Glasbey et’ al, 2019). It is categorized as independent experimental research intended at discovering knowledge that may benefit the educational practice. It also gathers information aimed at advancing the curriculum.
|The difference between traditional and translational research is that essentially, translational research emphases on improving practice instead of producing knowledge, which is traditional research’s objective (Al-Hadithy, 2015).
Also, translational research requires a high demand for personal involvement and commitment unlike in traditional research which can use representatives.
|Data Collection||Translation research uses data from patient reported information, questionnaire surveys acquired through email, phones, internet, or interviewer/self-interviews, informant/proxy data, reviews of hospital or ambulatory medical records, and collection of biological material (such as serum, urine, hair, saliva) from study participants. (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015).||Traditional research can use online surveys, structured questionnaires, and phone interviews (Glasbey et’ al, 2019). The research can use a large size of sample and thus, it demands substantial amount of time to ensure the collection of high-quality and accurate data. The research also involves the utilization of data management programs such as trending, randomizing, and predicting tools, which aid in the researching processes and analysis of data||In both research methods, the researchers use interviews and questionnaires during data collection.
In translational research, the researchers have the freedom to control the dependent variables to make sure the desired outcomes were attained, while in traditional research, the researcher solves the problem that the research designed to answer.
Al-Hadithy, T. (2015). The Traditional Vs. The Modern Translation Classroom: A Need for New Direction in the UAE Undergraduate Translation Programs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 180-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.026
Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Mercier, S. (2015). “Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research”, European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier Ltd, 42 (28): 3140–3148, DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.07.020.
Glasbey, J., Nepogodiev, D., Kamarajah, S., Goh, Y. L., Layton, G., McKay, S. C., … & Bhangu, A. (2019). Challenging traditional research: A synopsis of the National Research Collaborative Meeting (NRCM) in 2017.
Fort, D. G., Herr, T. M., Shaw, P. L., Gutzman, K. E., & Starren, J. B. (2017). Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1(1), 60-66.