ANALYTIC-WEEK 6PAPER TO EDIT-REQUESTING DR.VIC

Week 6Translation Science and Synthesis

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a revised evidence synthesis paper using the Week 4 assignment submission and integrating course faculty feedback. This assignment provides you with the opportunity to create a practice question and identify a translation science theory or model to serve as the framework for a practice change project.

Instructions

Follow these guidelines when completing the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have any questions.

1. Review the course faculty feedback on the Week 4 Assignment and make revisions incorporating the course faculty feedback.
2. Add to the paper by writing a one sentence clear and concise practice question.
3. Add to your revised Week 4 paper by identifying and presenting a translation science theory or model to serve as the framework for a practice change project.
4. Use the most current version of Microsoft Word that is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing. You can tell the document is saved as the current version because it will end in “docx.”
5. All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed. This written assignment will be screened for originality by Turnitin.
6. Review the rubric for the grading criteria.

The assignment includes the following components:

1. Introduction
   1. Write a one-sentence purpose statement.
   2. Introduce the practice problem. (Cited)
   3. Introduce the evidence-based intervention using research study evidence. (Cited)
2. Analysis of the Practice Problem (1-2 paragraphs): Using research study evidence and non-research evidence, present the following at the national and local levels (cited):
   1. Significance
   2. Prevalence
   3. Mortality
   4. Economic ramifications of the practice problem
3. Evidence Synthesis: Using a minimum of three quantitative research study articles and a minimum of three non-research study evidence sources, write a synthesis of evidence to include the following:
   1. Identify the main themes and salient points that emerge from the sources. (Cited)
   2. Compare and contrast the main points from all evidence sources. (Cited)
   3. Present an objective overarching synthesis of research evidence about the practice problem. (Cited)
4. Practice Question: Write a one sentence clear and concise practice question that includes the following:
   1. Population
   2. Intervention
   3. Comparison
   4. Outcome(s)
   5. Timeframe
5. Selection of a Translation Science Theory or Model (2-3 paragraphs)
   1. Apply a translation science theory or model to support the practice change project.
   2. Determine how the identified translation science theory or model serves as the framework for the design of a practice change project.
   3. Propose how stakeholders are integrated into the phases of the selected theory or model.
6. Conclusion
   1. Write one concise paragraph, providing a clear and logical summation of the paper.
7. Appendix A: Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as Appendix A. Complete all sections of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool for each research study Include the following:
   1. Include a minimum of three quantitative research studies.
   2. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

• Length: 6-8 pages (not including title page or references page)
• 1-inch margins
• Double-spaced pages
• 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
• Headings & subheadings
• In-text citations
• Title page
• References page
• Standard English usage and mechanics

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

1. Analyze research and non-research data for the purposes of critical appraisal and judgment of evidence for translation into practice. (POs 1, 3, 5, 7, 9)
2. Justify the use of translation science theory when designing, implementing, and evaluating a practice change project. (POs 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9)
3. Formulate an emerging practice question focusing on the evidence-based intervention to influence practice outcomes. (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9)
4. Synthesize high-level research and non-research evidence relevant to practice problems. (POs 1, 3, 5, 9)

Due Dates

• By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
• Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

Week 6 Assignment Grading Rubric

Week 6 Assignment Grading Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Requirements: 1.Write a one-sentence purpose statement. 2.Introduce the practice problem. (Cited) 3.Introduce the evidence-based intervention using research study evidence. (Cited)

20 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good introduction.

16 pts

Includes all requirements and/or provides a basic introduction.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor introduction.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of the Practice Problem

Requirements: Using research study evidence and non-research evidence present at the local and national levels: significance, prevalence, mortality, and economic ramifications of the practice problem. (Cited)

20 pts

Includes all requirements and an provides an excellent analysis of the practice problem.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good analysis of the practice problem.

16 pts

Includes all requirements and/or provides a basic analysis of the practice problem.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor analysis of the practice problem.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Synthesis

Requirements: 1.Identify the main themes and salient points that emerge from the sources. (Cited) 2.Compare and contrast the main points from all evidence sources. (Cited) 3.Present an objective overarching synthesis of research evidence about the practice problem. (Cited)

40 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent evidence synthesis.

36 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good evidence synthesis.

32 pts

Includes all requirements and/or provides a basic evidence synthesis.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor evidence synthesis.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Question

Requirements: Write a one sentence clear and concise practice question that includes: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Timeframe.

20 pts

Includes all requirements of the practice question. Question is excellently written.

18 pts

Includes all requirements of the practice question. Question is very well written.

16 pts

Includes all requirements of the practice question and/or question is basically written.

0 pts

Includes less than all requirements of the practice question and/or question is poorly written.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTranslation Science Theory or Model

Requirements: 1. Apply the translation science theory or model to support the practice change project. 2. Determine how the identified translation science theory or model serves as the framework for the design of a practice change project. 3. Propose how stakeholders are integrated into the design of the theory or model.

40 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of translation model and/or stakeholders integration into theory model.

36 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of translation model and/or how stake holders integration into theory model.

32 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a basic discussion of translation model and/or how stake holders integration into theory model.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or how stake holders are integrated into the theory model.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Requirements: Write one concise paragraph, providing a clear and logical summation of the paper.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent conclusion.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good conclusion.

8 pts

Includes all requirements and/or provides a basic conclusion.

0 pts

Provides fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor conclusion.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Standards

Requirements: 1. Uses appropriate Level I headers. 2. Reference and citations are in current APA style. 3. Paper length is 6-8 pages excluding title, reference pages, and appendix.

15 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent APA style and standards.

14 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good APA style and standards.

13 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a basic APA style and standards.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements of APA style and standards and/or provides poor style and standards.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing

Requirements: 1. Uses standard English grammar and sentence structure. 2. No spelling or typographical errors. 3. Organized presentation of ideas.

15 pts

Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing.

14 pts

Includes all requirements and demonstrates very good clarity of writing.

13 pts

Includes no fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix A

Requirements: 1. Three quantitative research studies 2. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence. 3. Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as Appendix A.

20 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent summary table.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good summary table.

16 pts

Includes all requirements and/or provides a basic summary table.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or a poorly completed summary table.

20 pts

Total Points: 200

PreviousNext