Using the Walden Library – Peer-Reviewed Article on Nurse Practitioner Care in a Nursing Home

This article covers Using the Walden Library – Peer-Reviewed Article on Nurse Practitioner Care in a Nursing Home.

Permalink: https://premiumacademicaffiliates.com/using-the-walden-library

premiumacademicaffiates.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.

Peer-Reviewed Article on Nurse Practitioner Care in a Nursing Home

Where can you look for evidence to support your ideas and scholarly writing? You will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights throughout your degree program. It is critical to use peer-reviewed and scholarly journal resources when searching the research literature. You may have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. . For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.

Peer-Reviewed Article on Nurse Practitioner Care in a Nursing Home

The peer-reviewed article I will cite is “Effects of a Geriatric Nurse Practitioner on Process and Outcome of Nursing Home Care” (1989).   To find this article, I searched the Am J Public Health Journal library.  When determining the best type of article to use for this post, I referenced the web article “What Types of References are Appropriate?” (S.C. Pan. 2021).  This article includes information on peer-review journals, and determines that these are the best to use. An article in the National Library of Medicine (NLM. 2021) assisted me in understanding what a peer-reviewed article all entails.  The article I found discusses using doctors versus nurse practitioners to care for the elderly in nursing homes.  The main difficulty I found was to find an article that was both relevant to the topic as well as current.  This article is a little dated, however, I did feel that the findings in this peer-reviewed article are still relevant today.  The article discusses an improvement in activities of daily living, nursing and drug therapies.  Also, that the number of admissions to hospitals as well as the days in the nursing home were decreased with the use of a Nurse Practitioner in the nursing home setting.  This journal would be helpful to classmates of mine.  It did appear to have well-written and well-researched nursing topics.  This database will also be helpful to me going forward as I will need to reference more peer-cited information for class.

References

Kane, R & Garrard, J & Skay, C & Radosevich, D. (1989). Effects of a Geriatric Nurse Practitioner on Process and Outcome of Nursing Home Care.  ALPH. September 1989. Volume 79. No. 9.

National Library of Medicine staff. (2021).  Peer-reviewed literature. National Library of Medicine website. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/stats_tutorial/section3/mod6_peer.html

S.C. Pan. (2021). What Types of References are Appropriate.  UCSD psychology website.  https://psychology.ucsd.edu/undergraduate-program/undergraduate-resources/academic-writing-resources/writing-research-papers/appropriate-references.html

To Prepare for NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library:

Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.

Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.

By Day 3 of Week 6

Post the following:

Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article.

Discussion Using the Walden Library NURS 6003

this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not. NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library

By Day 6 of Week 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.RE: Discussion – Week 6Collapse

Thank you, Connor, for this excellent post. I read with great interest your recommendations. Understanding the library’s dynamic can be difficult at first, but the more we use it the easier it will get. One feature I like is the Course Guides. It helps me to “jump” into the course material without returning to the course page. Occasionally, the number of articles to locate and review can be overwhelming, especially if we are taking more than one course at the same time. The Course Guides section takes you directly to the required reading of a specific course and offer assignment help (Walden University, 2020a).

As an international student I can tell you that the library is user-friendly. Language difficulties, cultural differences and lack of prior library experience are the key barriers to library use amongst international students (Murray & Preston, 2016). However, Walden Library makes it easy for us. Like you, I strongly recommend the use of the library to help us advance academically.

References

Murray, A. & Preston, H. (2016). Empowering international nursing students to become

effective library users. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 33(3), 239–243. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/hir.12149

Walden University Library. (2020). University Library
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library

Learning Resources

Required Readings
Eaton, S. E. (2010). Reading strategies: Differences between summarizing and synthesizing. Retrieved from https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2010/09/29/reading-strategies-differneces-between-summarizing-and-synthesizing/
Smith, T. (2009). Critical appraisal of quantitative and qualitative research literature. Austrian Institute of Radiography, 56(3), 6–10. Retrieved from http://www.minnisjournals.com.au/articles/radiographer%20smith%20dec%2009.pdf
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical
Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)
Document: Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for success (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

As you continue, premiumacademicaffiates.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Using the Walden Library)

Using the Walden Library

Scholastic writing is constantly being improved as a vast array of resources are introduced and made available to all students. The basics of sentence construction was learned in the early stages of our education, and as we all advanced in our education, the depth and quality of writing has been enhanced. Research has become the main stay of all publications and has given each article the authority to publish relevant information. An effective and useful approach to scholarly writing is to avoid making assumptions and provide objective information derived from published research articles (Laureate Education, 2018). It is easy for one to present personal opinion, but the information must always be supported by cited information to make the information credible. In the same article, it was also emphasized that the writer must know the audience to be able to provide the appropriate scholarly voice to convey the message for the target audience. I find this very important because in my personal reading, I am always attracted by articles that speak to me and it makes it easier for me to understand the content.

Peer reviewed article. To analyze the relevance of scholastic writing, I searched a peer-reviewed article in the Walden University database. The Walden University library contains a wide list of resources organized in a way that you can search articles using filters to isolate and identify the specific topic of interest (Walden University Library, n.d.). The preparatory stage of writing a paper takes the longest time for me because I have to create a plan and skeletal format for my essay. After creating a framework, I utilized the online links provided within our course to access the related resources for the assignment. The Walden University library is formatted in a way that will allow users to navigate through the system easily. I did not have any difficulty looking choosing a peer reviewed article at all. The title of the article I chose is “Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 [COVID-19]” (Ahn, et al, 2020). I found this article in the Walden University library using the filters Nursing category, and further isolated the topics using the peer reviewed database. This gave me the option to choose among a list of articles that caught my interest. There are a lot of information circulating in social media about corona virus and I always try to validate the information by reading scholastic articles. The topic about corona virus is current and relevant not just to the nursing profession but to everyone because of the global effects it has brought. Reflecting on the clarity of the topic presented by the article is critical in appraising research papers (Smith, 2009). The peer reviewed article provided a smooth flow of information from the presentation of facts and data gathered to the conclusions derived from the findings. Although the findings did not indicate the discovery of an approved vaccine, it has provided relevant information regarding the improved approaches to case identification and its management.

Database. Walden University provides a vast array of resources for students from online links, easy access to scholarly articles, books, and readily available personnel to guide students along the way (Laureate Education, 2018). The online library is a one stop shop for students providing ease of use with its simple format. I did not experience any difficulty utilizing the database and I highly recommend the use of this resource to all students. The wide range of topics contained in the database makes this link a universal resource for anyone looking to find scholastic articles.

References

Ahn DG, Shin HJ, Kim MH, Lee S, Kim HS, Myoung J, Kim BT, Kim SJ. Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Mar 28;30(3):313-324. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2003.03011. PMID: 32238757.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Smith, T. (2009). Critical appraisal of quantitative and qualitative research literature. Austrian Institute of Radiography, 56(3), 6–10. Retrieved from http://www.minnisjournals.com.au/articles/radiographer%20smith%20dec%2009.pdf

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

Reply Quote Email Author

Peer Response

Hello R…, how are you? This is a great post. I agree with you; Walden library offers unlimited academic resources to locate the information we need (Walden University, 2020a). Most assignments require the use of the library; therefore, understanding the expectations of each course and mastering the research skills will contribute to our academic success (Walden University, 2020b).

Although I find the site user-friendly, I have experienced some issues during the search. For instance, if the keywords are hyphenated or include certain punctuation signs like a colon, the search leads nowhere. A strategy I use then is to locate the article on Google Scholar and then look for it on the Walden library, removing any punctuation sign. Have you experienced the same?

On the other hand, a great feature I use is the Ask a Librarian. I usually reach out with questions about in-text citations and references format. Would you believe that most of the time they reply is almost instantaneous? Also, did you know that the library offers all types of citations, including APA? The yellow folder icon located on the top right will take you to the citations section. Even though in some cases it does not reflect the updates from the 7th edition, it is still a great tool. I leave you with a screenshot of this feature. I hope you find it helpful. All the best!

R…,

Thank you for your post. I agree that Walden University provides many resources for students to be successful scholarly writers. I have found the online library and the writing center very useful in composing my assignments and discussion forum postings. In scholarly writing, analyzing research and correctly citing the source can add credibility and integrity to the student’s work (Laureate Education, 2018, 1). While I agree researching topics that interest you, it is important to remember to ensure your paper is written in a subjective manner and not just present your opinions (Laureate Education, 2018, 2). Using evidence, especially peer-reviewed articles, enhances your writing from professional, which draws on your experience, to scholarly (Laureate Education, 2018, 3).

References:

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success Program Transcript

FEMALE SPEAKER: Research and writing is a significant part of your academic experience at Walden. Many incoming students are competent at professional writing, but it’s important to remember that it’s very different from scholarly writing. Professional writing is based on experience, but scholarly writing is based on evidence. We anticipate some of the challenges you may face in scholarly writing, so here are a few tips for success.

In scholarly writing, you must identify who the audience is for your writing, and find your scholarly voice to present your research findings in an academically appropriate manner. You writing should be clear, concise, evidence-based, and objective.

Another common challenge many students face is very basic, but very manageable– the fear of writing. First, it’s necessary to identify your fears. Perhaps you received negative feedback in the past and it felt personal. Maybe you feel like you need your writing to be absolutely perfect, or that you’re the only one struggling to grasp a concept or technique.

As you continue, premiumacademicaffiates.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Using the Walden Library)

I can assure you, you are not alone. Walden wants to help you succeed. The Walden Writing Center website, along with faculty, are available to guide you, advise you, and give the feedback necessary to help you grow and mature as a writer. Feedback is a crucial component to improve your writing, so don’t let it scare you. Ask for feedback from people you trust– your classmates, faculty, friends, or colleagues. Becoming a better writer is an ongoing, lifelong process. The more comfortable you are with receiving and implementing feedback and the revision process, the better your writing skills will become.

Another tip is to remember that it’s important to celebrate each victory you have along the way. When you finish your course or complete a paper, give yourself the credit you deserve for the accomplishment.

Last, and perhaps the most important, find your passion. Time management and persistence are important tools for finishing your degree, but the passion that drives you toward your goal is the fire that can help keep you motivated. Mountains of reading and long nights of writing are achievable if you ignite the passion for your work.

You’ve come to Walden to make a difference in yourself and in your community. Strive for excellence in your research and writing, and Walden will help guide you on the path that you choose.

© 2012 Laureate Education, Inc.

Using the Walden Library

Hello everyone and Welcome to your Week 4 discussion. Maintain your perseverance as you have only three (3) weeks remaining in the course.

Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.

To Prepare:

• Review the information presented in the Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
• Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you.

Main Post due by Day 3 February 3, 2021 by 11:59pm MT

Post the following for your Main Post:

Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not

Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA.

Both Peer Responses are due by Day 6 Day 6 February 6, 2021 by 11:59pm MT

In your Peer Responses: Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for use of alternative resources.

Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.

Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.

==========================================================================================================

Important Discussion Information

As you continue to focus on the discussion topic and interacting with your peers, I will continue post to additional information that will benefit you now and especially in your future courses. During your Week 4 discussion I will again share as many links/tips with you that were covered during the preceding discussions. I encourage you to review my post to everyone so as to collect as much information as you wish.

Reminders:

FULLY REVIEW COURSE ANNOUNCEMNTS #7 AND #8.

Attachments:

Attachments will not be scored. This has been posted within prior announcements. Why are attachments not allowed? Due to the ever-evolving nature of computer viruses – your computer could be infected without you being aware, your attached submission be infected then transmitted via anyone else opening your attachment on their personal computer.

Cite your sources:

So, what exactly is Dr Gatlin expecting me to do regarding citations and the listing of references cited within the written work? Per the Discussion Grading Rubric concerning source utilization Dr Gatlin will evaluate for:

Main Post: Three (3) sources listed with each of those sources cited in the written work per APA format as indicated within the Discussion exemplar within your course resources. (This has been available to you the entire term)

Peer Responses: Two (2) sources listed with each of those sources cited in the written work per APA format.

*Concerning source utilization, in short – do not list a source and not cite it within the written work; nor cite a source without including it within your reference list. This action cost you valuable points as the discussion post point value is weighted as indicated within the rubric.

Label your Discussion post:

Label your Discussion Post = Main Post, Peer Response #1, Peer Response #2

Unlabeled Post leaves the Instructor with no choice but to grade the post as they are dated. This unfortunately can result in a tremendous value of points being deducted. Label your Discussion Post. Only post Identified per the above labeling will be scored!

Unlabeled Discussion Post will be scored in the order completed beginning with Main Post followed by Peer Response 1 then Peer Response 2.

Technical Issues:

If you experience technical issues while working with your Walden Template or issues with SafeAssign or submitting your assignment in BlackBoard – please contact the Walden Customer Care Team

Plagiarism Reminder – I will pick two different discussions from each student to submit via SafeAssign. However, if I detect any suspicious activity, as mentioned in the course announcement addressing plagiarism – I will explore further and will submit it also to SafeAssign.

As a reminder, at some point during the course, I will submit two (2) of your discussion posts to SafeAssign for plagiarism evaluation.

As a nurse and clinic manager in a neurosurgery clinic, we see a variety of issues relating to neurological conditions. Recently we have seen an increase in post-operative surgical site infections (SSI’s), especially in the first 30-day post-operative period. Because of this, I have found an interest in looking into research pertaining to issues related to SSI’s and how to better prevent them and early identification and interventions. The Walden Library made the research of this interest much easier to identify reliable evidence-based research to implement into practice. Other reliable sources such as Pub Med, NCBI, and EBSCO are also able to easily produce resources. I find that these databases, including the Walden Library are crucial to continuing education and pursuing an MSN.

Neurosurgery post-operative infections can be of particular concern,

especially those that involve ventricular shunt procedures (Schaffzin, et al., 2017). Fortunately, there is extensive research that addresses the prevention, occurrence, barriers leading to, and identification of post-operative surgical site infections. According to research conducted by the American Journal of Infection Control, SSI’s are the most common and serious complications in surgically treated patients (Cassir, et al., 2015). During this same study, this team changed their method of pre-operative data collection. In the preoperative phase, patients age, comorbid conditions, length of preoperative stay, reason for surgery, type of operative procedure, if a previous surgery had been conducted at the same site, if a prosthetic or transient material was to be used (Cassir, et al., 2015). This data collection helped identify patients who are at higher risk for SSI’s.

With the vast amount of information and research conducted on this topic, and even specifically in Neurosurgery, I will be able to better find evidence-based literature not only for my academic endeavors but professional as well. However, there are some challenges to identifying correct and up to date information when searching through the library and other databases. It is most appropriate to use information dated within the last 5 years. Sometimes this is hard to do because when changing your search options to the last 5 years, it can drastically change the search size of information available.

Resources

Walden University Library. (2021). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

Schaffzin, J. K., Simon, K., Connelly, B. L., & Mangano, F. T. (2017). Standardizing

preoperative preparation to reduce surgical site infections among pediatric neurosurgical

patients, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics PED , 19 (4), 399-406. Retrieved Dec 18,

2020, from

https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/19/4/article-p399.xml

Cassir, N., De La Rosa, S., Melot, A., Touta, A., Troude, L., Loundou, A., Richet, H., & Roche,

P. H. (2015). Risk factors for surgical site infections after neurosurgery: A focus on the

postoperative period. American journal of infection control , 43 (12), 1288–1291.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.005

Walden University MSN Core Nursing courses – Generic information for success:

1. Being graduate level adult learners – It is very unlikely that you will experience the quantity of or detailed guidance as in the announcements received in this course. Being so: Read the course announcements thoroughly and completely. Read the course announcements at least daily for any updates. Going forward the Instructors may post items at any time throughout the day or night. I have unfortunately received emails throughout this course with questions for which the information was previously addressed within the announcements. Again, reading the course announcements is imperative for your success.
2. The utilization requirement of APA within assignments will increase as you progress to courses that are considered “writing intense”. The APA requirement within discussions will remain as you experienced within this course. This course is not considered writing intense. Familiarize yourself with the correct usage of APA 7^th edition. It is within every graded item, within every Nursing course going forward. Familiarize yourself and utilize the Walden resources for APA assistance. I have diligently posted links to those resources several times during this course.
3. Use ONLY your Walden student email for communication with any Walden University representative. When communicating with your Instructor ALWAYS include your course number and section. Within this course I posted in the announcements numerous times your specific course number and section, as well asked that you include that information when emailing me. Sadly, I received emails that did not include this information, this delayed my assisting you as I had to request your course number and section. This alerts me that course announcements were not being thoroughly and completely reviewed. Going forward it is highly unlikely Instructors will respond to any email other than your Walden student email as email not in Walden origin routinely gets flagged as spam then deleted. Also be fully aware that Instructors required to respond to any email other than your designated Walden Student email.
4. Be mindful if you do not participate in any Walden course during the 1^st week (Day 1 through Day 7) – you will be removed from the course by Walden University regardless of your excuse. Your Instructor has no control over this – it is university policy!
5. The grading of any assignment cannot proceed by your Instructor unless you submit your assignments via SafeAssign, then in BlackBoard. Traditionally a -0- score will be awarded, with no resubmission availability. At the Graduate level, you are responsible for your work being submitted per instructions AND grading rubric parameters and due date/time. Again, I strongly encourage you to submit your assignments before Day 7 to ensure yourself sufficient time to seek assistance and correct the issue. Remember SafeAssign Drafts and SafeAssign are different!
6. For Discussions – There is a six (6) day period (Monday, Day 1 through Saturday, Day 6) allowed for the Discussion participation. No allowances for participation will be made outside of the six (6) Discussion active period. Any submitted post outside of the 6-day active discussion period will not be graded and you will receive a -0- score.
7. Faculty cannot accept or grade any assignment or discussion through email.
8. Do not wait until Day 7 to begin or submit your assignment. Assignments are due Day 7. At the Graduate level, you are responsible for your work being submitted per instructions, grading rubric parameters and due date and time. Being so = I strongly encourage you to submit your assignments well before Day 7 to ensure yourself sufficient time to seek assistance and correct any issue encountered. I have purposely made myself available to you each day including weekends and responded to you within 12 to 24 hours. Be mindful, Instructors are not required to respond to you on a daily basis. Going forward your Instructors will respond to your Contact the Instructor communications and emails within the required 48 hours’ time period.

As you continue, premiumacademicaffiates.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Using the Walden Library)

1. As a graduate level student, Instructors will not reach out to you to ensure your assignments/discussions are completed and submitted correctly. As a graduate level adult learner, it is your responsibility to ensure that your discussions and assignments are completed and submitted timely and correctly. As an adult learner, you need to take the initiative and reach out to your Instructor immediately when you encounter an issue. You were offered an online orientation by Walden University – Did you participate in that orientation? If not, I strongly suggest you contact your advisor and make arrangements.
2. If you experience technical issues, please utilize your resources and contact the Walden Customer Care Team or Walden IT for assistance. Going forward you will encounter several PowerPoint presentations, Walden Templates within your future courses at Walden University, as well be required to submit multiple items with a single submission.
3. Understand the Time Zones at Walden University and the applicable conversion. Your course calendar is in Eastern Time as is the time/date stamp of submission/participation for your discussions and assignments. Going forward all of your future Nursing courses require that your Discussions, any Quiz or Assignment will continue to be due submitted in Mountain Time.
4. Have a computer and Internet backup plan. What will you do if your computer crashes or your Internet is not working?  Computer/Internet/work issues are your responsibility. Allowances will not be made due to these issues causing a lack of participation or missed deadline, rather a -0- score will be awarded. Save your work on a flash or hard drive. Know where you can go to access the Academic Skills Center as it is an excellent resource to assist in your success.
5. For Assignments – Only prior communication with AND Instructor approval will late assignments be considered for grading. Assignments submitted late will be deducted 4% daily until Day 5 OR may deduct the entire 20% regardless of time/day of late submission. This is at the discretion of each Instructor and will vary course-by-course. After Day 5, in any course, the assignment will be scored a -0-.
6. Be familiar with how to access and utilize the Walden resources. I posted the most useful and frequently utilized resources numerous times within the course announcements.
7. Ensure your discussions have a substance, depth and breadth, critical analysis, and reflection element within the grading rubric. In short – if your discussion Main Post does not closely compare to the discussion exemplar located within the course resources and announcements posted within this course your grade will be drastically reduced.
8. Know who and where to submit any documentation if necessary, for allowances for any late or missed assignments. Remember Instructors are not permitted to accept any medical documentation.
9. Know who your advisor is and how to contact them.
10. Know where and how to locate your student feedback. This course is 6 weeks in duration – In Week 5 I received emails inquiring as to “I see my grade but don’t know why points were deducted” – It was sadly apparent the feedback being provided was not being reviewed by those students. Your numeric score and student feedback are in different locations – this was addressed in the course announcements. If you cannot locate or have not located your student feedback for discussions and assignments – I strongly encourage you to contact the Customer Care Team as you have missed a tremendous amount of information.

Student Resources: Here is a partial listing of Walden University resources that have been shared with you during this course. You will frequent these as you progress throughout your future courses. Again, I strongly recommend that you bookmark each of these for your future courses.

• SafeAssign
•  library
• Walden Customer Care Team
• Walden IT
• Time Zones at Walden University
• Academic Skills Center
• Writing Center
• Walden Student Resources
• Integrity and Writing At Walden University
• Scholarly Ethics at Walden University
• APA citation at Walden University
• Peer-Reviewed Research
• Walden Library Databases
• Walden University Library Databases dedicated to Nursing
• Phi Nu
• http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/nursing
• http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly
• http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/nursing
• http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice/tone
• http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice/academicdiction
• http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice/writingconcisely
• http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/discussionpost/writing
• https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/paperreviews
• https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/multilingual
• https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/ask
• https://www.waldenu.edu/experience/support-services

PSYC 3002 Assignment Resources: Week 1 Discussion

 Print Page Report a broken link

• Assignment Resources
• Week 1 Discussion
  • Goals & objectives
  • Choose a database
  • Set up your search
  • Learn more
• Return to PSYC 3002 Course Guide

Goals & objectives

This week’s discussion asks you to use the Walden Library to find a journal article that uses a sample to represent a larger population.

The methodology of a research study is typically described in an article’s abstract. Since library databases allow you to search for specific terms in an abstract, you can limit your results to only articles that mention either sample or sampling.

In this guide you will learn how to:

• choose an appropriate database
• identify and combine search terms
• search an article’s abstract for methodology

Choose a database

A good place to start your research for many psychology topics is the database APA PsycInfo. 

1. On the Library homepage, click the Research by Subject button.
   
2. Select Psychology from the list.
3. Now you are on the Psychology Research Page. Click on the Psychology databases drop-down menu and choose APA PsycInfo. You may need to log in with your myWalden e-mail and password.
   

Set up your search

Now you’re on the main search page of the database PsycINFO where you can set up your search using the three search boxes at the top of the page.

For this discussion, choose a topic that interests you. This example uses high school students and drug abuse. The steps below show you how to combine your search terms and limit your results to studies about this topic that also use sampling as part of their research methods.

1. Break your topic into keywords and enter one idea or concept per box.
   In the top search box enter:high school studentsIn the middle search box enter:drug use OR substance abuse OR drug addictionNote: Combine related terms and concepts in one search box separated by OR. This returns results that include any of these terms.In the bottom search box enter:sample OR sampling<strong”>Note: In the drop-down menu to the right of the search box, change Select a field (optional) to AB Abstract. This narrows your results by searching for this term only in the article’s abstract.</strong”>
   
2. Scroll down the page, and under Limit your results, click the checkboxes for Full Text and Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journals.
3. Click the Search button. From your results list, click on the title of an article that interests you, and you’ll see in the abstract that the terms sample OR sampling are bolded.
4. Review the instructions in your Blackboard classroom to ensure the article you select meets the discussion’s requirements.

Learn more

Read more about identifying relevant databases, selecting and connecting keywords, setting up your search, and searching specific parts of an article (field searching).

• Guide: Database search skills

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6003_Module04_Week06_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

As you continue, premiumacademicaffiates.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Using the Walden Library)

No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6003_Module04_Week06_Discussion_RubricRE: Discussion – Week 4 Initial PostCollapse

The peer-review article I found is “Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic, and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA.” In the world we live in, technology continues to advance by the day. As a future nurse practitioner, telemedicine has always drawn my attention because I always wondered how it worked and whether or not it is effective. According to my research, telemedicine is relatively new, finding my article was challenging. The first resource I used to find information on telehealth was the database in Walden University’s library because it contains many databases (n.d.). Unfortunately, I was not successful in the University’s library database and looked elsewhere. I found the article in the U.S. National Library of Medicine database. In order to determine if the article was reliable, I referenced Walden University’s library Evaluating Resources to learn more about reliable journals and articles (n.d.). Telemedicine provides luxury to people by being able to seek medical treatment from the convenience of their homes. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the outlook of telemedicine tremendously because the country was on lockdown, and medical offices were closed (Kichlo et al.,2020). I highly recommend this database to my colleagues because it contains many medical-related articles that can be used for further papers in the future. The database provides reliable sources and also helps with proper citation.

Resources

Kichloo, A., Albosta, M., Dettloff, K., Wani, F., El-Amir, Z., Singh, J., Aljadah, M., Chakinala, R. C., Kanugula, A. K., Solanki, S., & Chugh, S. (2020). Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Family medicine and community health, 8(3), e000530. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437610/pdf/fmch-2020-000530.pdf.

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing, Retrieved September 19, 2021 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals, Retrieved September 19, 2021 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success Program Transcript FEMALE SPEAKER: Research and writing is a significant part of your academic experience at Walden. Many incoming students are competent at professional writing, but it’s important to remember that it’s very different from scholarly writing. Professional writing is based on experience, but scholarly writing is based on evidence. We anticipate some of the challenges you may face in scholarly writing, so here are a few tips for success. In scholarly writing, you must identify who the audience is for your writing, and find your scholarly voice to present your research findings in an academically appropriate manner. You writing should be clear, concise, evidence-based, and objective. Another common challenge many students face is very basic, but very manageable– the fear of writing. First, it’s necessary to identify your fears. Perhaps you received negative feedback in the past and it felt personal. Maybe you feel like you need your writing to be absolutely perfect, or that you’re the only one struggling to grasp a concept or technique. I can assure you, you are not alone. Walden wants to help you succeed.

The Walden Writing Center website, along with faculty, are available to guide you, advise you, and give the feedback necessary to help you grow and mature as a writer. Feedback is a crucial component to improve your writing, so don’t let it scare you. Ask for feedback from people you trust– your classmates, faculty, friends, or colleagues. Becoming a better writer is an ongoing, lifelong process. The more comfortable you are with receiving and implementing feedback and the revision process, the better your writing skills will become. Another tip is to remember that it’s important to celebrate each victory you have along the way. When you finish your course or complete a paper, give yourself the credit you deserve for the accomplishment. Last, and perhaps the most important, find your passion. Time management and persistence are important tools for finishing your degree, but the passion that drives you toward your goal is the fire that can help keep you motivated. Mountains of reading and long nights of writing are achievable if you ignite the passion for your work. You’ve come to Walden to make a difference in yourself and in your community. Strive for excellence in your research and writing, and Walden will help guide you on the path.

 NURS_6003_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Posting	Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Supported by at least three current, credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Contains some APA formatting errors.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness	Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.
First Response	Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.
Second Response	Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.
Participation	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric

Read More:

https://premiumacademicaffiliates.com/health-information-management-professional/