Develop a Legislative Matrix based upon the specific legislators in a residential/geographical legislative district. State and Federal legislators will be identified: State Representatives, Senators, Congressman and Governor. Each legislator’s assigned committees and any active legislation bills and/or past legislative initiatives will be identified. This information will be used to assist in the development of the Legislative Communication assignment.

Student will develop a Legislative Matrix based upon the specific legislators in a residential/geographical legislative district. State and Federal legislators will be identified: State Representatives, Senators, Congressman and Governor. Each legislator’s assigned committees and any active legislation bills and/or past legislative initiatives will be identified. This information will be used to assist in the development of the Legislative Communication assignment.

What You Will Learn show
  • Please check rubric for detailed information see attachment

Submission Details:

  • Support your responses with examples.
  • Cite any sources in APA format.Rubric Name: NSG6002 Week 2 Project Rubric

    This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

    No Evidence

    0 points

    Unsatisfactory

    41 points

    Satisfactory

    46 points

    Proficient

    53 points

    Exemplary

    60 points

    Identify specific legislative District State Governor, areas of focus and interest State Senators, committees and appointments

    Student did not submit assignment

    Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided.

    Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague.

    Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment.

    Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment.

    / 60

    This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

    No Evidence

    0 points

    Unsatisfactory

    37 points

    Satisfactory

    43 points

    Proficient

    48 points

    Exemplary

    55 points

    State Representatives (House), committees and appointments Federal Senators, committee and appointments

    Student did not submit assignment

    Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts.

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts.

    Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts.

    Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts.

    / 55

    This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

    No Evidence

    0 points

    Unsatisfactory

    34 points

    Satisfactory

    39 points

    Proficient

    44 points

    Exemplary

    50 points

    Federal Congressman (House), committees and appointments State Specific legislation involving legislators

    Student did not submit assignment

    Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses 1 credible resource in the assignment.

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment.

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource.

    / 50

    This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

    No Evidence

    0 points

    Unsatisfactory

    6 points

    Satisfactory

    7 points

    Proficient

    8 points

    Exemplary

    10 points

    Writing, grammar and APA application: Scholarly grammar, use of APA 6th edition formatting, use of headers and primary sources

    Student did not submit assignment

    Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

    Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors.

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors.

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors.

    / 10

    Total

    / 175

    Overall Score

    No Evidence

    0 points minimum

    Unsatisfactory

    118 points minimum

    Satisfactory

    135 points minimum

    Proficient

    153 points minimum

    Exemplary

    175 points minimum