This article covers Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies.
Permalink: https://premiumacademicaffiliates.com/structural-versus-strategic-family-therapies
premiumacademicaffiates.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.
Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies
Although structural therapy and strategic therapy are both used in family therapy, these therapeutic approaches have many differences in theory and application. As you assess families and develop treatment plans, you must consider these differences and their potential impact on clients. For this Assignment, as you compare structural and strategic family therapy, consider which therapeutic approach you might use with your own client families.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
· Compare structural family therapy to strategic family therapy
· Create structural family maps (Refer to Gerlach (2015) in this week’s Learning
Resources for guidance on creating a structural family map.) or LOOK AT THE
ATTACHED ONE.
· Justify recommendations for family therapy
The Assignment
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
· Summarize the key points of both structural family therapy and strategic family therapy.
As you continue, premiumacademicaffiates.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies)
· Compare structural family therapy to strategic family therapy, noting the strengths and weaknesses of each.
· Provide an example of a family in your practicum using a structural family map.
Note: Be sure to maintain HIPAA regulations (Refer to Gerlach (2015) in this
week’s Learning Resources for guidance on creating a structural family map.) or
LOOK AT THE ATTACHED ONE.
· Recommend a specific therapy for the family, and justify your choice using the
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Nichols, M. (2014). The essentials of family therapy (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Chapter 5, “Bowen Family Systems Therapy” (pp. 69–88)
- Chapter 6, “Strategic Family Therapy” (pp. 89–109)
- Chapter 7, “Structural Family Therapy” (pp. 110–128)
McNeil, S. N., Herschberger, J. K., & Nedela, M. N. (2013). Low-income families with potential adolescent gang involvement: A structural community family therapy integration model. American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(2), 110–120. doi:10.1080/01926187.2011.649110
Méndez, N. A., Qureshi, M. E., Carnerio, R., & Hort, F. (2014). The intersection of Facebook and structural family therapy volume 1. American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(2), 167–174. doi:10.1080/01926187.2013.794046
Nichols, M., & Tafuri, S. (2013). Techniques of structural family assessment: A qualitative analysis of how experts promote a systemic perspective. Family Process, 52(2), 207–215. doi:10.1111/famp.12025
Ryan, W. J., Conti, R. P., & Simon, G. M. (2013). Presupposition compatibility facilitates treatment fidelity in therapists learning structural family therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(5), 403–414. doi:10.1080/01926187.2012.727673
Sheehan, A. H., & Friedlander, M. L. (2015). Therapeutic alliance and retention in brief strategic family therapy: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(4), 415–427. doi:10.1111/jmft.12113
Szapocznik, J., Muir, J. A., Duff, J. H., Schwartz, S. J., & Brown, C. H. (2015). Brief strategic family therapy: Implementing evidence-based models in community settings. Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 121–133. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.856044
Required Media
Psychotherapy.net (Producer). (2010). Bowenian family therapy [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Author.
Triangle Productions (Producer). (2001). Brief strategic therapy with couples [Video file]. La Jolla, CA: Author.
Read More:
FAQs
What are the similarities between structural family therapy and strategic family therapy?
Structural family therapy and strategic family therapy share several common aspects as prominent approaches in the field of family therapy. One notable similarity is their mutual emphasis on addressing family dynamics and interactions as a means to resolve presenting issues. Both approaches underscore the significance of comprehending and altering dysfunctional patterns within the family system. Moreover, both models frequently involve the active involvement of the therapist in the therapeutic process, either through integration into the family system (strategic therapy) or through the restructuring of it (structural therapy). Lastly, both approaches acknowledge the role of communication and communication patterns in family dysfunction, aiming to modify these patterns to attain therapeutic objectives.(Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies)
What is a strategic family therapy?
“Strategic family therapy is an approach to family counseling that emphasizes the resolution of particular issues within a family unit by employing strategic interventions for positive transformation. Developed by influential figures like Jay Haley and Cloe Madanes, this method perceives family problems as stemming from dysfunctional interaction patterns and communication breakdowns. Therapists strategically introduce directives and interventions to disrupt these patterns, sometimes utilizing paradoxical techniques to stimulate change. The ultimate objective is to foster healthier family dynamics, leading to enhanced relationships and issue resolution.”(Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies)
What is the difference between structural family therapy and Bowenian family therapy?
Structural Family Therapy, developed by Salvador Minuchin, focuses on examining and reorganizing the family’s structure to improve functioning. It emphasizes identifying and changing dysfunctional family roles and boundaries, often through interventions like boundary setting and reframing family dynamics. The therapist actively participates in restructuring family interactions.(Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies)
In contrast, Bowenian Family Therapy, created by Murray Bowen, centers on understanding and reducing emotional triangles within the family system. It emphasizes differentiation of self, encouraging family members to become more self-aware and less emotionally reactive. The therapist takes a more observational and less interventionist role, aiming to help clients develop better emotional autonomy and resilience.(Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies)
While both approaches aim to improve family relationships, Structural Therapy is more active in reshaping family dynamics, while Bowenian Therapy focuses on individual growth and emotional maturity within the family context(Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies)
What is the Bowenian structural or strategic family systems theory?
Bowenian structural and strategic family systems theory is a well-known approach in the field of family therapy. Developed by Murray Bowen and Jay Haley, these theories provide distinct perspectives on understanding and addressing family dynamics. Bowen’s structural theory focuses on analyzing roles, hierarchies, and boundaries within the family to enhance self-awareness and differentiation among family members. In contrast, Jay Haley’s strategic family systems theory is action-oriented, aiming to identify and modify problematic family patterns and communication styles through strategic interventions. These theories play significant roles in the realm of family therapy, offering diverse strategies for addressing family-related issues.(Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies)