Instructions
Review this unit’s readings, and include specific information with citation within your written response as appropriate.
Write a (3-5) three to five-page paper (excluding APA title page and reference pages) comparing Freud, Mahler, Adler, and Erikson. Compare and contrast the developmental models of Freud and Erikson, and then compare and contrast the developmental theories of Adler and Mahler. Are there any similarities between all of them? Be sure to also address the following:
· Compare and Contrast Freud & Erikson
· Compare and Contrast Adler & Mahler
· Similarities of all listed above
· There should be…
o A brief description of each theory. Which perspective appeals to you more, and why?
· What are some ways the Adlerian approach can be applied to group counseling? What are some advantages of using a group format with this approach?
· What concepts from these psychoanalytic approaches do you see as being potentially useful in your work as a nurse psychotherapist? Describe why.
· Why should the nurse psychotherapist understand developmental theories for application in clinical practice?
You should cite a minimum of three APA references.
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Rubric
NU672 Unit 2 Assignment – Foundational Theories of Human Development Paper Rubric
NU672 Unit 2 Assignment – Foundational Theories of Human Development Paper Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent of Paper
30 pts
Exemplary – Exceeds Expectations
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials. All instruction requirements noted.
26 pts
Advanced – Meets Expectations
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. All instruction requirements noted.
23 pts
Intermediate – Needs Improvement
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of the paper being summarized with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and or development. Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Only uses scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials. Most instruction requirements are noted.
20 pts
Novice – Inadequate
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Use of course content is superficial. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Content of paper is inaccurately portrayed or missing. Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Does not use scholarly resources. Missing some instruction requirements.
0 pts
Not Proficient
Assignment not completed.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning
30 pts
Exemplary – Exceeds Expectations
Through critical analysis, the submitted paper provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content. Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints. All instruction requirements noted.
26 pts
Advanced – Meets Expectations
Paper is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources. Information is synthesized to help fulfill paper requirements. The content supports at least one viewpoint. All instruction requirements noted.
23 pts
Intermediate – Needs Improvement
Paper lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content without adding any new information or insight. The paper’s content may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete. Most instruction requirements are noted.
20 pts
Novice – Inadequate
Submission is primarily a summation of the assignment without further synthesis of course content or analysis of the scenario. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Missing some instruction requirements. Submits assignment late.
0 pts
Not Proficient
Assignment not completed.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Knowledge
30 pts
Exemplary – Exceeds Expectations
The summary of the paper provides information validated via scholarly resources that offer a multidisciplinary approach. The student’s application in practice is accurate and plausible, and additional scholarly resource(s) supporting the application is provided. All questions posed within the assignment are answered in a well-developed manner with citations for validation. All instruction requirements noted.
26 pts
Advanced – Meets Expectations
A summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained from the assignment is presented. Student indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice. All instruction requirements noted.
23 pts
Intermediate – Needs Improvement
Objective criteria are not clearly used, allowing for a more superficial application of content between the assignment and the broader course content. Student’s indication of how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice is vague. Most instruction requirements are noted.
20 pts
Novice – Inadequate
The application of knowledge is significantly lacking. Student’s indication of how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice is not practical or feasible. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. Application of knowledge is incorrect and/or student fails to explain how the information will be used within their personal practice. Missing several instruction requirements. Submits assignment late.
0 pts
Not Proficient
Assignment not completed.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
5 pts
Exemplary – Exceeds Expectations
Well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Writing is concise with a logical flow of ideas.
4 pts
Advanced – Meets Expectations
Organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement. Argument content is developed with minimal issues in content flow.
3 pts
Intermediate – Needs Improvement
Poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content. Narrative is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work. Purpose statement is noted.
2 pts
Novice – Inadequate
Illogical flow of ideas. Missing significant content. Prose rambles. Purpose statement is unclear or missing. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. No purpose statement. Submits assignment late.
0 pts
Not Proficient
Assignment not completed.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, Grammar, and Spelling
5 pts
Exemplary – Exceeds Expectations
Correct APA formatting with no errors. The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions. There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors.
4 pts
Advanced – Meets Expectations
Correct and consistent APA formatting of references and cites all references used. No more than two unique APA errors. The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability. There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors.
3 pts
Intermediate – Needs Improvement
Three to four unique APA formatting errors. The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors.
2 pts
Novice – Inadequate
Five or more unique formatting errors or no attempt to format in APA. The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous. Submits assignment late.
0 pts
Not Proficient
Assignment not completed.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Write From Scratch