WEEK6-APRN AS ENTERPRENEUR-POWERPOINT

Unit 6 Assignment – The APRN as Entrepreneur

 

Instructions

• Generate a professional Power Point presentation that sums the following areas:
• Introduction to topic, include introducing yourself, why this is important (1 slide)
• Develop a business plan to start or manage a practice (6-10), identify SWOT analysis, marketing plan, key stakeholders, reimbursement, insurance issues, a solid budget plan (expense and revenue sheet)
• Construct  an employment contract for an advanced practice nurse in your selected care setting. (3-4)) Be specific. What should APRN ask for salary, vacation, Health insurance, dental, vision, long and short term insurance, professional development/education fees, professional journals, any others?
• Compare the legal, ethical, and contractual considerations for APRN in the employment setting (2-3 slides)

Parameters

• Inclusive of references in presentation, and references then fully presented in final slide of presentation as a reference page (1-2 slides)
• Use APA for formatting
• Presentation should be minimally 25 slides, enough slides to appropriately cover material being presented
• Presentation is to be designed as if you, the ARPN, were seeking funding for starting your own clinic.
• Presentation to include:Contract portion is to be designed as if student/APRN was seeking a position. What would an APRN want in the contract? Provide details within the contract about salary, insurances, benefits, duties, etc.
• Contract portion is to be designed as if student/APRN was seeking a position. What would an APRN want in the contract? Provide details within the contract about salary, insurances, benefits, duties, etc.
• MUST USE NOTES SECTION. NO AUDIO. Use the notes section to discuss content. Professor will be assessing analysis and synthesis of understanding of the content)

Estimated time to complete: 10 hours

Rubric

NU626 Unit 6 Presentation Rubric

NU626 Unit 6 Presentation Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreparation and Introduction in Presentation

NU625-CO2; NU625-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I; PRICE-R

30 pts

5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.

27 pts

4

Identifies a creative, focused and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.

24 pts

3

Identifies a focused and manageable/ doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.

21 pts

2

Identifies a topic that while manageable/ doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.

18 pts

1

Little effort put into preparation and design. Little effort into the use of technology. Slides/presentation disorganized., non-effectual. Very limited information provided about business plan lacks depth and analysis

0 pts

0

Does not clearly identify a topics that is relative to the assignment.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis of Presentation

NU625-CO2; NU625-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I; PRICE-R

40 pts

5

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing deep knowledge and understanding of presentation topics.

36 pts

4

Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing knowledge and understanding of presentation topics.

32 pts

3

Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing knowledge and understanding of presentation topics.

28 pts

2

Relates information from relevant sources representing some knowledge and understanding of presentation topics.

24 pts

1

Relates information from irrelevant sources representing some knowledge and understanding of presentation topics.

0 pts

0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeElements and Methodology of the Presentation

NU625-CO2; NU625-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I; PRICE-R

60 pts

5

All elements of the methodology are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

54 pts

4

Most critical elements of the methodology are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

48 pts

3

Some critical elements of the methodology are appropriately developed; however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

42 pts

2

Critical elements of the methodology are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

36 pts

1

Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology.

0 pts

0

The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, Presentation, and Style

NU625-CO2; NU625-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I; PRICE-R

60 pts

5

Organizes and synthesizes the learned materials as evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. All slides and flow of presentation well organized. Demonstration of clarity of ideas and logical transition. Effective transition slides and between topics. Graphics enhance value of the presentation

54 pts

4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

48 pts

3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

42 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

36 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion to presentation

NU625-CO2; NU625-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I; PRICE-R

40 pts

5

States a final slide conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.

36 pts

4

States a final slide conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.

32 pts

3

States a final slide conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.

28 pts

2

States a general final slide conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

24 pts

1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.

0 pts

0

States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClear Discussion of Presentation using a Strength/Weakness/Opportu ity/Threat (SWOT) analysis

NU625-CO2; NU625-CO3; PRICE-P; PRICE-I; PRICE-R

20 pts

5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

18 pts

4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

16 pts

3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

14 pts

2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

12 pts

1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0 pts

0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Mechanics

PRICE-P; PRICE-I;

10 pts

5

The presentation exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9 pts

4

The presentation exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

8 pts

3

The presentation exhibits command of written English language conventions. The presentation has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7 pts

2

The presentation exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The presentation has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6 pts

1

The presentation exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The presentation has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

0

The presentation does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The presentation has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

PRICE-P; PRICE-I

10 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8 pts

3

The paper exhibts command of written English lanuage conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the fow of communication.

7 pts

2

The paper exhibts a limited command of written English lanuage conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6 pts

1

The paper exhibts little command of written English lanuage conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English lanuage conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10 pts

Total Points: 270